Re: OK Nancy, Where Is It?

Jon Kvebaek <[email protected]> wrote in
     <[email protected]>:
> [email protected] (josX) writes:
>
>> Jon Kvebaek <[email protected]> wrote in
>>	<[email protected]>:
>>> [email protected] (josX) writes:
>>         (new trend around here to ignore message-ID ?)
>>>> I M Openminded <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Stig Bull wrote:
>>>>>> I M Openminded wrote:
>>>>>>> The original statement was "A Richter 15 quake is one *billion* times
>>>>>>> stronger than a Richter 9." which makes it a million, not a billion,
>>>>>>> all the world around.
>>>>>>>   [15 - 9 = 6; 10^6 = 1,000,000]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Let me be a bit more precise, the amplitude of the quake increases by a 
>>>>>> ten-fold for each step on the Richter scale. The energy released increases 
>>>>>> more, with a factor of about 32 for each step on the scale. Therefore, the 
>>>>>> *energy* released by a hypothetical Richter 15 earthquake, would be about a 
>>>>>> billion times more than the energy released by a 9 one.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed ... sorry for nitpicking
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> Instead of nitpicking about if this earthquake-15 number is
>>>> unrealistic (which i don't see how).
>>>
>>> Surviving it is unrealistic.
>> 
>> How come, i have survived numerous heavy earthquake, to be exact: every
>> earthquake on the globe since 1974. Get it? I guess not.
>
> How many earthquakes do you think there has been on earth that would
> hit 15 on the Richter scale?

Exactly, so why do you think you know this isn't going to be a Richter
15 event. The information talks about "mountain building", which means
entire mountain-ranges get thrust up out of nowhere, complete plates
slamming under and over each other. You did notice that earthquakes are
measured in acceleration of the ground. There is also rock getting
thrust in the air, and then falls back. What acceleration do you
think any equipment would register there, for those locations. Should
be pretty awesome right? In keeping with tradition, earthquakes are
graded in their most severe locales, so we can only assume they did
the exact same thing.

>>> Who are "we"? Noone is feeding me those stories, except your and
>>> Nancy's ravings about the invisible genetic-doctor-giant-inhabited
>>> planet with a tail of dancing moons.
>> 
>> When you are posting to a sci.* newsgroup, you better be correct with
>> your ridicule attempts.
>
> Please tell me what was I said that is incorrect. I believe Nancy has
> stated that the "planet" is inhabited by a giant race that used earth
> for gentical experiments (leading to the human race) in prehistoric
> times.

She in fact says this is a scam to make people scared of aliens.

> Also, she claim that her planet has a string of moons trailing
> behind it. I take it you believe the self-entitled "emissary"'s word?
>
>> My, you are thick. People are trying to descrie what a richter 15
>>                                         ^^^^^^^
>> That a typo for 'decree' ??
>
> Thank you for pointing that out. I will try to repeat it less often
> that you write "denail".
>
>> Yeah, at the epi-centre. Of course they take the worst-case scenario, "we
>> are only human, so we are pessimistic!!"
>
> And do you have any idea whatsoever of what devasting effects such a
> quake would have for the *entire* planet?
> 
>> They were SOOO right in that latest movie "matrix" when they said humans
>> only believe a pessimistic outlook, weren't they. Haven't seen it? it's
>> a very nice parody on how the mental world looks like on this planet.
>
> I have seen The Matrix several times. I find it to be more of a take
> on the more extreme forms of socialism, where humans are engineered to
> feed the state.

Oh my god, we *DO* have a long way to go, don't we. SIGH SIGH SIGH.

What do you think people in Russia think of communism? they think
it's a great ideal, kapitalism, that is evil (it's pretty much the
same story as for kapitalism under the population i think). When
they are as deluded as yourself (which some are!) they would think
this movie is about kapitalims, and they wouldn't be wrong either:
you would be both wrong, and right, because it is about both. But to
whom am i talking here.

Why are you so stupid that you still think there is a difference
between communism and kapitalism.
They are both slogans, little one.
Communism: "let's make this world better for all of us, and work
together!" 
Kapitalism: "let every man fight for himself, and god for all!"

What is the end result of both?

Do you really think that is the issue here ??

Jos